|
Back to school
|
|
September 7, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
This week, teachers and students in Canada’s
journalism programs are gearing up for a new year of learning, debating,
chasing stories and sweating deadlines. J-Source is a good place to jump-start the year. In
the Students'
Lounge, our contributors are talking about replacing textbooks
with an iPad, and how to keep cover
letters out of the trash bin. The Lounge features a students' tool
box, directories of awards and
job
opportunities, and news about the student press.
And it's a place to examine and debate the changing state of
journalism education, including one U.S. university's decision to close its
journalism program. Given there are still plenty of arguments to keep j-schools
open, J-Source's 'Teaching
Journalism' section is well-stocked with classrooms tools and tips, along
with deeper reflection on education issues. Working journalists will also find
useful gems in these sections - not to mention a deep well of 'back to school'
story ideas.
Comments»
|
|
Breaking the silence on Pakistan
|
|
August 24, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
In Pakistan, a disaster of epic proportions
has unfolded. The Times
of India reports it will take years for the country to recover. Yet media
coverage has been relatively muted. In a Global
Journalist panel discussion, journalists working in the region agree
coverage of the flood lacks urgency. To illustrate the situation closer to
home, the pages of J-Source were silent in the first weeks of the crisis,
compared to extensive posts and discussion following the Haiti earthquake. Until today, with Claude Adam's piece about why we don't cover Pakistan.
In a thoughtful segment, Al Jazeera's Listening
Post asks: What is it about the images of this disaster that has failed to
evoke the same compassion as others have done?
Even the celebrity news website Jezebel has noted
the quiet reaction. In this
New York Times report, the relationship between media coverage and
international response is clear. A column
in the Guardian argues a steady drip of terror-obsessed media coverage has
affected how people feel. Yet Huffington Post columnist Ethan Casey feels blaming
the media is a cop-out for a recession-distracted western audience with
narrow attitudes about the Islamic world.
In the immediate aftermath, social media is helping spread the flow of information, reports Saman Sheikh. An awakening world is sending more reporters to the scene, aided by citizen journalism reports. But, clearly, the wall-to-wall coverage we’ve seen in the past is not part of the picture this time around. BBC's ‘Have
Your Say’ forum asks: Should it be?
Meanwhile, here at J-Source, an over-long silence has been broken. What are your thoughts? Who out there is working on the story? What decisions are being made in terms of coverage?
(Photo: Pakistan flood damage / Monica Smith, US Army)
Comments» (1)
|
|
Stursberg: loved and loathed
|
|
August 17, 2010 - Posted by Dana Lacey
|
Seems CBC head of English programming Richard Stursberg ruffled a lot of feathers during his six-year tenure. He was hired in 2004 as new blood to "shake the damn place up." The Tea Makers, a blog run by someone who purports to be an anonymous CBC insider, captured some tweets and posted a video likening the leader to another infamous leader. Toronto Life's "Eleven reasons CBCers loved/hated Richard Stursberg" includes: losing the Hockey Night in Canada theme song, revamping Radio 2 by ditching its classical bent, the 2005 lockout that gave CBC "pretty much what it wanted", losing broadcast rights to the Olympics and the Grey Cup, making anchors stand while delivering news in a new CNN-style format, and bumping Marketplace for Wheel of Fortune. One of the only positive reviews of Stursberg's legacy was penned by his former chief of staff, who credits Stursberg for turning CBC Television into the "second-most-watched network in the country."
Toronto Life's list of successes attributed to Stursberg are largely commercially driven: winning the bid for the World Cup and creating reality TV smash hits Battle of the Blades and Dragons' Den and sitcoms Little Mosque on the Prairie and Being Erica. The Toronto Star quotes Canadian Media Guild president Lise Lareau: "His view of a good program was one that had good ratings. People felt that he didn't support news, as a result. How public is a public broadcaster if you make it so commercial?"
Will CBC change much under new leadership? Now-retired long-time TV critic James Bawden doesn't think so: "Stursberg's schedule is very much the one CBC will be using this fall --it's too late to change much...That means a reliance on hour long dramas patterned after American series will continue on the new CBC schedule. It takes at least a year to program new TV series." Meanwhile, Howard Bernstein was so happy to see Stursberg go he announced "Ding dong, the witch is dead."
More»
|
|
Documents in the raw undermine propaganda
|
|
August 3, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
|
While the leaking of Afghan war documents has been
criticized in some Canadian columns, on the pages of J-Source WikiLeaks is
described as citizen
journalism we need and a new form of
asymmetrical journalism. Founder Julian Assange, a self-described ‘person of
interest’ to U.S. authorities, explains his decision to provide advance
viewings to select outlets. The mainstream media partnerships weren’t
completely comfortable: Assange later criticized the New
York Times for its handling of the data, including checking with the White
House before publishing and not providing a direct link to the documents. An alternative strategy could have been dribbles instead of dumps. Here
are links to compare the special reportage sites: New York Times,
Der
Spiegel, the
Guardian.
To Afghanistan observers, the documents undermined
government propaganda, which – we learn from the docs – includes paying for
positive stories. Unlike the NYT, J-Source has no problem providing a
direct link to the WikiLeaks war
documents site, as well as to data-dumping links and instructions
for CAR journos. (And we didn’t check with Ottawa first.)
(Photo: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, by Martina Harris/Julian Assange.)
Comments»
|
|
Census debates
|
|
July 27, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
The Canadian Association of Journalists has waded into the census debate, telling the government, "Don't slash our
census." Indeed, Statistics Canada data has long occupied a spot in J-Source's
resource section as an important
journalism tool. As well, journalism.net features a guide to
Canadians statistics that highlights census data. Journalists have long relied on Stats Can releases, such
as crime stat
reports, to develop news stories. Stats Can is also a source of industry
data, such as radio
listener-ship and Internet usage.
However, not
everyone is happy with census results, which can be sloppily
interpreted by the press.
Late in the game, the National
Statistics Council has also weighed in with a
statement defending the census. Previously, the NSC had issued a
brief response to Dr. Sheikh's resignation. Interestingly, the NSC
identified the questions that track unpaid hours caring for seniors and
children as the biggest source of complaints received - data women's
groups long sought as a base to argue for flexible workplaces, childcare spaces and other supports. Now, after a brief period of visibility for women's unpaid
work, the NSC recommends jettisoning the apparently nettlesome indicator as the price of compromise.
Comments»
|
|
G20 reports of media repression keep coming in
|
|
July 20, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
After the G20 folded its tent, first-hand
accounts of media repression have continued being posted on J-Source. In 'Access
Denied,' reporter Jesse Freeston describes being beaten by police. In the
Student's Lounge, there’s an account of a student journalist having to hand over his notes and camera, and in J-News, a story of cameras being returned with images gone. As calls for public scrutiny mount, this backgrounder on
covering public inquiries is a helpful read. So is the Riot Survival Guide. If you were there, Canadian
Journalists for Free Expression is conducting a survey of
journalists' experiences. And if you got roughed-up, take heart that although
the rest of the world wasn't very interested,
at least Canadians
tuned in.
Comments»
|
|
Accountability in crisis
|
|
July 6, 2010 - Posted by Dana Lacey
|
|
The motto of the Canadian Journalism Foundation is “as journalism goes, so goes democracy.” You could add “so goes accountability.” We see accountability take a backseat with BP’s staid denial of media access to areas affected by the company’s massive oil spill, but also in the company’s refusal to allow executives, oil workers and even rescue workers speak to the media. Now, the U.S. Coast Guard is supporting BP’s iron grip on information with a new rule declaring that no person is allowed within 65 feet of anything BP: that includes the oil boom, the rescue boats, and even those oiled animals we’ve seen flopping along the shoreline. All the while BP repeats the same tired line that they’re doing everything they can – but with no media investigating to ensure they are, in fact, doing everything they can to fix a massive mistake they made, how will we, the public, ever really know? Closer to home, Canadians are calling for a public inquiry into the G20, which saw many journalists arrested, beaten and generally denied access to covering the event. What stories did we miss because of that? Speaking of inquiries, the long-awaited inquiry into the 1984 Air India bombing spent over 60 pages detailing the murder – and subsequent investigation – of Canadian journalist Tara Singh Hayer, who was killed in his home in Surrey B.C. over a decade ago and whose killers remain unpunished, despite the tiring work of journalists like Kim Bolan. Any outsider has got to wonder: do journalists support impunity, or will we start demanding accountability?
More»
|
|
Fence holds up, rights not quite so sturdy
|
|
June 29, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
Ah, civil liberties. So long fought for, so quickly dispensed
with. Throughout the week, J-Source worked hard to keep up with reports of police actions
against journalists during the G20/8 Summit. The roughed-up and handcuffed
included a CTV
field producer, the National Post’s
photographers, and reporters for the Guardian
and Real News.
The Guardian’s Jesse Rosenfield describes his experiences in a podcast. “Free
speech appears to have fared poorly,” observes a Canadian Journalists for Free
Expression media
statement. All it takes, apparently, are a few broken windows and some
torched police cars – something that doesn’t stack up to a good old-fashioned
hockey riot, as this
Globe and Mail column noted. Meanwhile world leaders responded with another
helping of the recipe that feeds public protest – a pledge
to deepen public service cuts and expand free trade while saving banks from
taxation. Perhaps they’ll need
a higher fence for the next round.
Update: The first link of this article is to an Adam Radwanski column on new police powers under the Public Works Protection Act. Subsequent reports reveal the police had overstated their powers under the Act, someting Mr. Radwanski addresses in his next column. There's more info in this related news story.
Comments»
|
|
G8 outside the gate
|
|
June 22, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
|
As journalists trek toward the G8/20 Summit, it may be hard to muster excitement for another round of unmet
aid pledges and quickly
forgotten PR moments for the hosts. Outside the gates there's perhaps a more interesting story in the showdown between political power and street power.
Yet social activists complain the issues at stake seldom get covered, as focus
tends to settle on anarchist offshoots like the Black Bloc and Padded Bloc,
guaranteed to be wearing the most photogenic attire. Meanwhile,
Indigenous land rights are a
hot topic at related civil society gatherings, as are migrant
workers’ rights in a global economy, and the proposed 'Robin
Hood tax.' Journalists who find these things a yawn might want to wake up
and take note: time and again, yesterday's fringe
issues are tomorrow’s front
page.
To get an inside track, the G8/20 Toronto Community Mobilization
website is a hub for activities ranging from bike block actions to radical
street parties. Rabble.ca has a G8/20 ‘one
stop shop’ of alt media coverage, and has published a
guide to independent journalists covering the event, including what to do
when CSIS comes calling. The Toronto Media Co-op, a division of Dominion News,
is reporting on the People's
Summit, while OpenFile
offers coverage from a local perspective. The G20 Alt Media Centre is already abuzz with
reports, tweets, photos and video from the streets. There are also individual activists like Krystalline Kraus and Stefan Christoff blogging and tweeting
from ground zero, and a lively online debate about the relationship of the
bank bombers to social movements. Journalists who want to dig further into
the banquet of issues on offer will find a virtual library of resources at the G8 Information Centre provided by the University
of Toronto and Munk School of Global Affairs.
Comments»
|
|
When enough is enough
|
|
June 15, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
Press gallery journalists across the nation are calling for an end to Harper's history of information control. Photojournalists, documentary filmmakers and scientists are among those suffering the chill. Even the Taxpayers are ticked.
A joint op-ed
calls on journalists to report refusals and delays as news, and editors to turn
down proffered pap. In recent weeks, enterprising journalists have dug up some
great examples of info control, reporting on heavily scripted message
streams on Afghanistan, including crafted quotes for returning aid workers.
For your viewing pleasure, examples of the now-infamous Message Event Proposals are posted here. Anna Maria Tremonti's 'request count' is still ticking – to date, The Current has bagged six interviews with federal politicians, and 43 refusals. When the Tyee's reporter was barred from an event, he made it a story.
Back in 2007, Sharda Vaidyanath predicted an upside to a worsening relationship, leading to more enterprising reporting.
So far, though, the government response is clear: "Let them eat lakes!"
Comments»
|
|
We love the internet. If only it made us money.
|
|
June 8, 2010 - Posted by Dana Lacey
|
Canadians continue to celebrate excellence in journalism by awarding the country's best print, radio and television stories - and now, for the first time, many awards panels are considering digital content as a category in itself. That's how Dogsincanada.com got the first Best Website award at the National Magazine Awards, while Adviser.Ca took home a similar inaugural prize from the KRW business journalism awards. The Canadian Journalism Foundation, on the other hand, made a conscious decision not to differentiate great digital content from great journalism, and its annual award ceremony this Thursday will treat every story equally - no matter the medium.
But when it comes to day-to-day business of journalism, does digital get any respect? News organizations (and the advertisers that support them) are still looking for ways to make money off the web. Some are toying with paywalls, although reporters don't like the idea of restricted access to their words. Iconic magazines like Esquire are experimenting with augmented reality and electronic ink, while newspapers like The Globe and Mail are trying out radical solutions. Most are pouring money into websites and online innovation or looking for new ways to fund their operations. Journalists, meanwhile, are trying to figure out their own role in an increasingly multi-platform world. Amidst all the speculation of the state of the industry, business carries on as usual. Will journalists loose sight of journalism itself?
More»
|
|
CAJ conference: finding relevancy in troubled times
|
|
May 23, 2010 - Posted by Patricia Elliott
|
|
On May 28 the Canadian
Association of Journalists opens its national conference amid trying
times. The Winter
2010 issue of Media Magazine – the CAJ’s house journal – contains a candid
look at how the organization became strapped for cash, including the fall-out
of ‘the
Stevie Cameron affair.’ In addition to critical financial woes, the CAJ
recently seemed out of step over the Supreme Court source protection ruling, declaring defeat where others, like
Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, saw victory.
When president Mary Agnes Welch published an open
letter stating the organization was in crisis, J-Source readers weighed in
on what the CAJ
should do.
Obviously, people care enough to have an opinion. Over the
years, the CAJ has provided quality training, networking and advocacy for its members,
in addition to publishing Media Magazine
and developing a Code
of Ethics. Special educational events like January’s Innovate News conference help
journalists stay ahead of the curve. The upcoming Montreal conference will
include a full
roster of seminars, on topics such as collective action
for safety training and story-telling for
broadcast.
Whether or not CAJ can maintain its relevancy – and
solvency – in the years to come remains in the hands of its members. As Welch
put it in her letter: “The CAJ is only as strong as you make it.”
Comments»
|
|
edited by Patricia Elliott
Every week, we select a timely topic in journalism and explore it as The Big Issue. Patricia Elliot is a freelance magazine journalist, alternative media practitioner and author of The White Umbrella. She currently teaches journalism at The University of Regina.
|